You need to log-in or subscribe in order to use Student access.

5. How far was Gorbachev personally responsible for the collapse of Soviet control over Eastern Europe?

Gorbachev's rule was to be key in bringing about the end of Communism in the Soviet Union and, indeed, the collapse of Soviet control over all of the central and eastern satellite states. His decision to reform the Soviet Union politically and economically, and also to negotiate arms agreements with the US, was to lead to turmoil in the USSR. This, combined with his decision not intervene in the affairs of any of the Eastern European states was to lead to to the collapse of Soviet control throughout Eastern Europe.

Mikhail Gorbachev became leader of the Soviet Union in 1985. He was unlike previous Soviet leaders for several reasons. Not only was he was much younger than his predecessors but he also genuinely wanted to reform the Soviet Union; unlike previous leaders he was prepared to admit to the failings of the Soviet state and to try to rectify them.

How did Gorbachev want to reform the Soviet Union?

By the 1980s the gap between communist and capitalist countries were growing even larger. The Soviet Union and its allies were not able to compete with the West in the new industries of the 1980s e.g. in computers and telecommunications.

Farming was also failing to produce enough food. In the 1980s farming in the Soviet Union employed over 20 per cent of the workforce, compared with 3 per cent in the USA. On average each American farmer produced seven more times food than each Soviet farmer meaning that the Soviet Union had to import millions of tons of grain. There was corruption at the highest levels with the leading communists in each country living luxurious lives while ordinary people struggled to survive; this meant that communism was also discredited as a political ideology. In addition, the Soviet Union was spending a large percentage of its income on defence and keeping its army in Afghanistan where it was fighting a disastrous war.
 

Gorbachev was a realist but also an idealist in that he believed that Communism could be reformed without being dismantled. His aims for the Soviet Union were as follows:

  • To reform the economic system. This would be done by a process called 'perestroika' or 'restructuring'
  • To encourage more honesty and openness or 'glasnost'. This would mean free speech and an end to the persecution of dissidents
  • To stamp out corruption
  • Reduce the amount spent on defence. This would mean taking the Soviet troops out of Afghanistan and negotiating arms reductions with the USA

Activity: Video (AO1)

Watch the video below, People's Century: People Power, from 26 minutes to 30 minutes 30 seconds.

Note that this video can also be found on Daily Motion here

1. What was new about Gorbachev's approach to running the Soviet Union?

Activity: Source (AO3)

A Cartoon by Michael Cummings published in the British newspaper, the Daily Express. 24th August 1988

In pairs review the visual source below and discuss the question.

Question:

What does this Source suggest about the impact of Gorbachev's policy of Glasnost?

Click on the eye for hints:

  • Glasnost has become too big to handle / carry
  • Glasnost has attacked Gorbachev
  • Glasnost is holding up or promoting democracy and freedom
  • Glasnost was a problem even in its infancy as a policy

What did Gorbachev's reforms mean for Eastern Europe?

As you have seen from your study of events in Hungary, Czechoslovakia and Poland, Communism had failed to deliver a good life to the people of Eastern Europe; not only did people face political oppression but they also faced severe economic shortages and a poor standard of living.

Gorbachev's reforms in the Soviet Union meant that people in the eastern European states started to demand similar reforms; they now had real hope that change could be achieved.

This hope was reinforced by Gorbachev's attitude towards the east European states. He made it clear that he thought the leaders of these states should carry out reforms. More significantly he made it clear that he was not willing to use force to put down any rebellions in these states. This was the end of the Brezhnev Doctrine; the countries of Eastern Europe could do what they liked.

The leaders of most of the East European states who were old style, hard-line Communists were horrified by this situation.

Activity: Sourcework (AO3)

Read these two speeches by Gorbachev.

What can you learn from these speeches about Gorbachev's policies and his overall aims for the Soviet Union and the east European countries?

Gorbachev speaking in 1987

I want to put an end to rumours in the West, and point out once again that all our reforms are socialist. We are looking within socialism, rather than outside it, for the answers to all the questions that arise. Those who hope that we shall move away from the socialist path will be greatly disappointed.

Gorbachev, speaking to the United Nations on 7 December 1988

Force or the threat of force neither can nor should be instruments of foreign policy. The principle of the freedom of choice is mandatory. Refusal to recognise this principle will have serious consequences for world peace. To deny a nation the choice, regardless of any excuse, is to upset the unstable balance that has been achieved. Freedom of choice is a universal principle, It knows no exception.

In the speech to the United Nations (above) Gorbachev also announced a reduction of half a million Red Army troops. This was a clear signal to the governments and peoples of the Eastern satellite states that the Brezhnev Doctrine was definitely at an end and that the Soviet Union would not intervene to end political opposition; indeed Gorbachev actively supported reform movements within the Communist Party of Hungary when the Prime minister Miklós Németh set up multi-party elections.

This situation was to lead to the rapid collapse of governments in the satellite states including the dramatic tearing down of the Berlin Wall in November 1989:

 

As you can see from the map above, the ordinary people of the Eastern European states took matters into their own hands; it was clear that it was no longer political leaders determining events, but ordinary people.

Activity: Video (AO1 and AO2 - cause and consequence)

Watch the rest of the People's Century video above from 30 minutes 30 seconds to 47 minutes

1. Make notes on what happened in each of the East European states

2. From what you can see on the map above and the video, what factors allowed these states to regain independence?

As you will have seen from the video there were may reasons why the collapse of communism took place so rapidly in the satellite states - economic problems, political discontent, the peaceful actions of ordinary people in 1989 - also known as 'people power'. However, Gorbachev's actions remain key for allowing the collapse to happen, and for ensuring that there was no bloodshed.

Activity: Source work (AO3)

Read the two sources below written by historians.

  1. According to historians Tony Judt and John Lewis Gaddis in Sources A and B, what was important about Gorbachev's actions in explaining the collapse of Soviet control over Eastern Europe?
  2. According to Gaddis in Source C, how can the collapse of Soviet control over Eastern Europe be explained?

Source A

'By indicating that he would not intervene he decisively undermined the only real source of political legitimacy available to the rulers of the satellite states: the promise (or threat) of military intervention from Moscow. Without the threat the local regimes were politically naked.'

(Judt, Postwar, pg 632)

Source B

'Gorbachev ensured that the great 1989 revolution was the first one ever in which almost no blood was shed...In both its ends and its means, then, this revolution became a triumph of hope. It did so chiefly because Mikhail Gorbachev chose not to act, but rather to be acted upon.

From John Lewis Gaddis, The Cold War (Penguin, 2005) pg 239)

Source C

What no one understood, at the beginning of 1989, was that the Soviet Union, its empire, its ideology – and therefore the Cold War itself – was a sand pile ready to slide. All it took to happen was a few more grains of sand. The people who dropped them were not in charge of superpowers or movements or religions: they were ordinary people with simple priorities who saw, seized, and sometimes stumbled into opportunities. In doing so they caused a collapse no one could stop.

From John Lewis Gaddis, The Cold War (Penguin, 2005) p.238

What was the impact of Gorbachev's relations with the West?

One of Gorbachev's aims had been to reduce spending on defence.  He decided to abandon the arms race and attempt a negotiated reduction in arms with the USA. This was not only because of economic reasons; Gorbachev was also very aware of the dangers of nuclear weapons.

The Chernobyl disaster, when an explosion destroyed a reactor at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in the Ukraine, only heightened Gorbachev’s awareness of the dangers of nuclear power. As Anatoly Chernyaev, an aide to Gorbachev, put it, ‘Gorbachev knew even before that catastrophe about the danger of nuclear weapons. That explosion showed that, even without war and without nuclear missiles, nuclear power could destroy human kind’ (quoted in the CNN television series, The Cold War).

Reagan was also interested in disarmament and had previously put forward to the Soviets an arms control proposal known as ‘Zero Option’, which would eliminate all intermediate- range missiles in Europe. Gorbachev, unlike his predecessors, was prepared to discuss this option. This resulted in the two leaders meeting together in four summits to discuss arms control:

•  Geneva Summit, November 1985: No substantial progress was made but the two leaders did agree that ‘a nuclear war cannot be won and must not be fought’.

 Reykjavik Summit, October 1986: Talks ended without agreement, mainly because of disagreement over American's plans for a space based defence missile programme called Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI). Gorbachev said that SDI should be ‘confined to the laboratory’, but Reagan refused to make any concessions. However, the talks also covered the most sweeping arms control proposals in history.

•  Washington Summit, December 1987: An Intermediate-Range Nuclear Force Treaty (INF Treaty) was signed which actually agreed to abolish weapons – land-based missiles of intermediate and shorter range. This was an important first step in reducing the nuclear stockpiles of the two superpowers. Agreement was also reached for the first time on inspection of the destruction of missiles.

•  Moscow Summit, May 1988: Again there was disagreement over SDI, but arms reductions negotiations continued. Standing in Red Square, Reagan confessed that he now no longer believed that the Soviet Union was an ‘evil empire’.

Other foreign policy initiatives by Gorbachev were reassuring to the West. By 1988, Gorbachev had announced his plans to withdraw from Afghanistan and he pulled back Soviet aid to its ‘allies’ in the developing world.

The ‘thawing’ of the Cold War continued under the new U.S. president, George H.W. Bush. At the Malta Summit between the U.S. and Soviet leaders in 1989, Soviet Foreign Minister Shevardnadze announced that the superpowers had ‘buried the Cold War at the bottom of the Mediterranean’.

This improvement of relations with the West meant that the Soviet Union did not feel so threatened by the West and so there was less need to control Eastern Europe so tightly.

Activity: AO2 - Cause and consequence

1. Copy out the infographic below; add detail to show how each of these factors on the diagram contributed to the collapse of Soviet control in Eastern Europe.

2. Which of these factors do you consider to be most important? To what extent do you agree that Gorbachev was personally responsible for the collapse of Soviet control?

Activity: Role-play (AO2: An ability to construct historical explanations using an understanding of the motives, emotions, intentions and beliefs of people in the past.)

Work in groups. Plan and film a documentary on the collapse of Soviet control over Eastern Europe.

You will need to decide on:

  • a title and format for the documentary; include images and interviews
  • which factors you are going to focus on to explain the rapid collapse of communism in these countries. (Note that you could focus on one country in particular.)
  • Whether you are going to have a particular view point (e.g. was it Gorbachev's actions, the result of long-term factors or the result of the actions of ordinary people?)

Check your learning

Have a go at these 5 questions:

Which of these best describes Gorbachev's aims when he became President of the Soviet Union?

Where was the Soviet Union fighting a disastrous war which Gorbachev decided to end by withdrawing Soviet troops?

Use this field for hidden/teacher's explanations

What was the name given to Gorbachev's plans for restructuring the economy of the Soviet Union?

 

Which of the following did NOT contribute to the collapse of Soviet control in the majority of East European countries?

Which of these best describes Gorbachev's aims when he became President of the Soviet Union?

Use this field for hidden/teacher's explanations

Total Score:

Exam practice: Paper 1

 

b. Why did Gorbachev not intervene to stop rebellions against Soviet rule in East European states in 1989?

 

 



Hint:

This is a part b question worth 6 marks

You will need to explain two points.

Think about:

  • Gorbachev's overall aims for the Soviet Union and these affected his actions towards the East European states
  • The ending of the Brezhnev Doctrine
  • Gorbachev's improved relations with the West
All materials on this website are for the exclusive use of teachers and students at subscribing schools for the period of their subscription. Any unauthorised copying or posting of materials on other websites is an infringement of our copyright and could result in your account being blocked and legal action being taken against you.